How is FireBird rated when compared with PostgreSQL?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PostgreSQL-FireBird-tf3158857.html#a8761237
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---(end of broadcast)-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 21:31, RPK wrote:
> How is FireBird rated when compared with PostgreSQL?
Rated?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFwrSGS9HxQb37XmcRAj+lAJ9uFM+hNm+ink5SeOaaNRjCuASMaACgiBeE
PmhLjdXNwlPKRHHYpGuK+c4=
=v
On 2/1/07, RPK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How is FireBird rated when compared with PostgreSQL?
I don't know how it is rated, but honestly I looked at Firebird and it is
way too "quirky" and I could never get it to compile embedded. The
documentation is very very poor for that project when it
firebird is a 7.3 and postgresql is a 9.7
On 2/1/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 21:31, RPK wrote:
> How is FireBird rated when compared with PostgreSQL?
Rated?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
On Feb 2, 2007, at 04:48 , Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/07 21:31, RPK wrote:
How is FireBird rated when compared with PostgreSQL?
Rated?
Clearly, Firebird is a 2.0 and PostgreSQL is an easy 8.2.
Alexander.
---(end of b
RPK wrote:
How is FireBird rated when compared with PostgreSQL?
I used to be a big time user of Firebird, but then I discovered
PostgreSQL and have never looked back.
Firebird has only a few built in functions even the simple ones are
missing. To get the built in
functionality of PostgreSQL'
applications.
--
Brandon Aiken
CS/IT Systems Engineer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RPK
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:32 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL/FireBird
How is FireBird rated when compared with
RPK wrote:
How is FireBird rated when compared with PostgreSQL?
Firebird is a good db. But it has its spaces. Its is the little
brother of PG.
It has two modes: classic (spawn per connection, small caching) and
superServer (one program w/threads and lots of caching). superserver
does no
ruary 05, 2007 6:29 PM
To: Brandon Aiken
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL/FireBird
On 2/5/07, Brandon Aiken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FireBird is a direct descendant of Borland InterBase 6. Consequently,
much like Postgres inherited a lot of Ingres's weirdness (most of which
has
:* Brandon Aiken
*Subject:* Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL/FireBird
On 2/5/07, *Brandon Aiken* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
FireBird is a direct descendant of Borland InterBase 6. Consequently,
much like Postgres inherited a lot of Ingres's weirdness (mo
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:19, Tim Tassonis wrote:
> > The FSF says the MPL is not compatible with the GPL, but, well, the FSF
> > generally finds **all** non-GPL licenses incompatible with the GPL (BSD,
> > MPL, Apache, etc.). The only truly GPL-compatible license I know of is
> > LGPL (and ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/07 10:59, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:19, Tim Tassonis wrote:
[snip]
>> It's been said a million times by BSD advocats: put one line of code
>> under GPL and you instantly become a willingless slave of Richard
>> Stallman
> On 02/06/07 10:59, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:19, Tim Tassonis wrote:
> [snip]
>>> It's been said a million times by BSD advocats: put one line of code
>>> under GPL and you instantly become a willingless slave of Richard
>>> Stallmans hoards of children-eating communists.
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/06/07 10:59, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:19, Tim Tassonis wrote:
> [snip]
> >> It's been said a million times by BSD advocats: put one line of code
> >> under GPL and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/07 14:51, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/06/07 10:59, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:19, Tim Tassonis wrote:
>> [snip]
>
>> With all their talk about "community this" and "community that",
>> what else could they be but communists?
>
> I think you missed my joke there...
Yeah, Ron Johnson wrote me about that already. Sorry for that, I'm
probably too touchy when it comes to marking someone as a communist,
especially
16 matches
Mail list logo