On 17/09/11 00:09, Vick Khera wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Toby Corkindale
wrote:
However we have a new contender - ZFS performed *extremely* well on the
latest Ubuntu setup - achieving triple the performance of regular ext4!
Did you do any tuning to ZFS? There are many tweaks to
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Toby Corkindale
wrote:
> The zpool was created against an LVM logical volume (which was the same one
> used for all the filesystems measured in the tests). That LV was itself part
> of a volume group that was striped over three disks (Western Digital
> WD1003FBYX)
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Toby Corkindale
wrote:
> However we have a new contender - ZFS performed *extremely* well on the
> latest Ubuntu setup - achieving triple the performance of regular ext4!
Did you do any tuning to ZFS? There are many tweaks to it, like
putting a cache disk in fron
On 15/09/11 02:46, Robert Treat wrote:
Can you go into some more detail on how you set up ZFS on these systems?
I'm afraid my knowledge of ZFS is rather weak compared to the other
filesystems - all I really did was zpool create followed by zfs create,
using all the defaults.
The zpool was c
Dne 14.9.2011 03:15, Toby Corkindale napsal(a):
> Hi,
> Some months ago, I ran some (probably naive) benchmarks looking at how
> pgbench performed on an identical system with differing filesystems. (on
> Linux).
>
> Since then the kernel-level version of ZFS became usable, and there have
> been im
Can you go into some more detail on how you set up ZFS on these systems?
Robert Treat
conjecture: xzilla.net
consulting: omniti.com
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 08:15 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Some months ago, I ran some (probably naive) benc
On 14/09/2011 09:30, Toby Corkindale wrote:
> On 14/09/11 12:56, Andy Colson wrote:
>> On 09/13/2011 08:15 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Some months ago, I ran some (probably naive) benchmarks looking at how
>>> pgbench performed on an identical system with differing filesystems.
>>> (on L
On 14/09/11 12:56, Andy Colson wrote:
On 09/13/2011 08:15 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
Hi,
Some months ago, I ran some (probably naive) benchmarks looking at how
pgbench performed on an identical system with differing filesystems.
(on Linux).
[snip]
Did you test unplugging the power cable in t
On 09/13/2011 08:15 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
Hi,
Some months ago, I ran some (probably naive) benchmarks looking at how pgbench
performed on an identical system with differing filesystems. (on Linux).
Since then the kernel-level version of ZFS became usable, and there have been
improvements
Hi,
Some months ago, I ran some (probably naive) benchmarks looking at how
pgbench performed on an identical system with differing filesystems. (on
Linux).
Since then the kernel-level version of ZFS became usable, and there have
been improvements to btrfs, and no doubt various updates in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
