Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2005 23:49, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Estimate right now for going beta on 8.1 is July 1st ... aiming for a
> > >
> > > Isn't that feature freeze? Typically the
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'd almost think taht this shuld be much more prominently put in a
section on the main page of the web site, actually ... make it nice and
visible instead of buried on a sub page ...
I agree it would be good to have a link on the main page. Possibly near
"What's ne
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Robert Treat wrote:
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 23:49, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Estimate right now for going beta on 8.1 is July 1st ... aiming for a
Isn't that feature freeze? Typically there
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 23:49, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Estimate right now for going beta on 8.1 is July 1st ... aiming for a
> >
> > Isn't that feature freeze? Typically there has been a month between
> >
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Estimate right now for going beta on 8.1 is July 1st ... aiming for a
> Isn't that feature freeze? Typically there has been a month between
> feature freeze and the first official beta.
Right, the on
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 19:31:28 -0300,
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, James Croft wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
I'd go for 8.0. It's quite stable now, and 8.1 will take as long as it
needs to take to come out, w
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 19:31:28 -0300,
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2005, James Croft wrote:
>
> >Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >>I'd go for 8.0. It's quite stable now, and 8.1 will take as long as it
> >>needs to take to come out, which could be anything, but will l
On Tue, 24 May 2005, James Croft wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
I'd go for 8.0. It's quite stable now, and 8.1 will take as long as it
needs to take to come out, which could be anything, but will likely be
no earlier than the end of the year.
I believe there was talk about an 8.1 coming out to r
Scott Marlowe wrote:
I'd go for 8.0. It's quite stable now, and 8.1 will take as long as it
needs to take to come out, which could be anything, but will likely be
no earlier than the end of the year.
I believe there was talk about an 8.1 coming out to replace the caching
algorithm, but I believ
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 08:37, James Croft wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know if there is a publicly available release schedule for
> upcoming versions of PostgreSQL along with proposed new functionality?
>
> In a month or so I'm going to start on updating an app from Pg7.1 and
> would like to kno
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is a publicly available release schedule for
upcoming versions of PostgreSQL along with proposed new functionality?
In a month or so I'm going to start on updating an app from Pg7.1 and
would like to know if should start writing for Pg8.0 or if 8.1 is around
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
