Re: [GENERAL] Query Questions - PostgreSQL

2016-01-14 Thread Saulo Merlo
On 13/01/2016, at 3:30 PM, Saulo Merlo wrote: So.. I have a Query that is taking too long to complete. OLD QUERY: SELECT file.inode_idAS file_id, file.parent_inode_id AS file_group, file.relative_path AS file_type, file.file_data AS file_binary,

Re: [GENERAL] Query Questions - PostgreSQL

2016-01-13 Thread Saulo Merlo
Anyone who can help with this please? Thanks Sent from my phone > On 13/01/2016, at 3:30 PM, Saulo Merlo wrote: > > So.. I have a Query that is taking too long to complete. > > OLD QUERY: > >> SELECT > >> file.inode_idAS file_id, > >>

[GENERAL] Query Questions - PostgreSQL

2016-01-12 Thread Saulo Merlo
So.. I have a Query that is taking too long to complete. OLD QUERY: SELECT file.inode_idAS file_id, file.parent_inode_id AS file_group, file.relative_path AS file_type, file.file_data AS file_binary, file.node_full_path AS file_name, file.last_modified AS

[GENERAL] Query questions

2006-07-31 Thread Christian Rengstl
Hi list, i have a problem with creating a query and i hope somebody can give me some hints. I have the following table pid(varchar), crit(varchar), val1(varchar), val2(varchar), iDate(timestamp) where there are up to 63 million lines with 1500 distinct pids and around 42000 distinct crits: pid

Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2006-07-31 Thread A. Kretschmer
am 31.07.2006, um 15:32:19 +0200 mailte Christian Rengstl folgendes: Hi list, i have a problem with creating a query and i hope somebody can give me some hints. I have the following table pid(varchar), crit(varchar), val1(varchar), val2(varchar), iDate(timestamp) where there are up to 63

Antw: Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2006-07-31 Thread Christian Rengstl
My version is 8.1.4. Here is the plan for the query, it's performed on a smaller table, though because i can't access the biggest table at the moment: QUERY PLAN

Re: Antw: Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2006-07-31 Thread Richard Huxton
Christian Rengstl wrote: My version is 8.1.4. Here is the plan for the query, it's performed on a smaller table, though because i can't access the biggest table at the moment: QUERY PLAN

Re: Antw: Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2006-07-31 Thread A. Kretschmer
am 31.07.2006, um 15:55:39 +0100 mailte Richard Huxton folgendes: Christian Rengstl wrote: My version is 8.1.4. Here is the plan for the query, it's performed on a Total runtime: 1903.894 ms And yes i have indexes on both pid (varchar(15)) and

Antw: Re: Antw: Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2006-07-31 Thread Christian Rengstl
I meant that i have an index on pid and one on crit. A. Kretschmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 31.07.06 17.16 Uhr am 31.07.2006, um 15:55:39 +0100 mailte Richard Huxton folgendes: Christian Rengstl wrote: My version is 8.1.4. Here is the plan for the query, it's performed on a

Re: Antw: Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2006-07-31 Thread Richard Huxton
A. Kretschmer wrote: am 31.07.2006, um 15:55:39 +0100 mailte Richard Huxton folgendes: Christian Rengstl wrote: My version is 8.1.4. Here is the plan for the query, it's performed on a Total runtime: 1903.894 ms And yes i have indexes on both pid

Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2005-09-06 Thread Poul Jensen
Look into inheritance. It makes this easier. However, I don't care which RDBMS you use, management of 1000 identical tables is going to be a real pain and I think that everyone here will probably suggest that it is not exactly a sane thing to do. Thank you, Chris. I have omitted two

Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2005-09-05 Thread Chris Travers
Poul Jensen wrote: you want to create 1 million tables, all with one of 2 schemas? I started out with a schema for each file, thinking I could utilize the schema structure in queries, but I don't see how. Schemas are useful for grouping tables according to users/owners. Other than

Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2005-09-04 Thread Poul Jensen
Thank you very much for your response! It leads to another couple of questions: I'm building a database containing key parameters for ~500,000 data files. The design I found logical is Two tables for each file: 1) Larger table with detailed key parameters (10-15 columns, ~1000 rows), call

Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2005-09-04 Thread Douglas McNaught
Poul Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: you want to create 1 million tables, all with one of 2 schemas? I started out with a schema for each file, thinking I could utilize the schema structure in queries, but I don't see how. Schemas are useful for grouping tables according to

Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2005-09-04 Thread Poul Jensen
you want to create 1 million tables, all with one of 2 schemas? I started out with a schema for each file, thinking I could utilize the schema structure in queries, but I don't see how. Schemas are useful for grouping tables according to users/owners. Other than that, do they add

[GENERAL] Query questions

2005-09-03 Thread Poul Jensen
I'm building a database containing key parameters for ~500,000 data files. The design I found logical is Two tables for each file: 1) Larger table with detailed key parameters (10-15 columns, ~1000 rows), call it large_table 2) Small table with file summary (~30 columns, 1 row), call it

Re: [GENERAL] Query questions

2005-09-03 Thread Ragnar HafstaĆ°
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 00:59 -0800, Poul Jensen wrote: I'm building a database containing key parameters for ~500,000 data files. The design I found logical is Two tables for each file: 1) Larger table with detailed key parameters (10-15 columns, ~1000 rows), call it large_table 2)