On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:56 +0100, Alex Stapleton wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2005, at 17:02, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 02:43, vinita bansal wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> My application is database intensive. I am using 4 processes since
> >> I have 4
> >> processeors on my box. Th
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Stapleton):
> On 21 Jul 2005, at 17:02, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 02:43, vinita bansal wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> My application is database intensive. I am using 4 processes since
>>> I have 4
>>> processeors on my box. There are times when all th
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 09:56, Alex Stapleton wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2005, at 17:02, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >
> > My feeling is that you may be going about this the wrong way. Most
> > likely the issue so far has been I/O contention. Have you tested your
> > application using a fast, battery backed ca
On 21 Jul 2005, at 17:02, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 02:43, vinita bansal wrote:
Hi,
My application is database intensive. I am using 4 processes since
I have 4
processeors on my box. There are times when all the 4 processes
write to the
database at the same time and time
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 02:43, vinita bansal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My application is database intensive. I am using 4 processes since I have 4
> processeors on my box. There are times when all the 4 processes write to the
> database at the same time and times when all of them will read all at once.
>
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 07:43 +, vinita bansal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My application is database intensive. I am using 4 processes since I have 4
> processeors on my box. There are times when all the 4 processes write to the
> database at the same time and times when all of them will read all at onc
Hi,
My application is database intensive. I am using 4 processes since I have 4
processeors on my box. There are times when all the 4 processes write to the
database at the same time and times when all of them will read all at once.
The database is definitely not read only. Out of the entire d
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 16:45 +, vinita bansal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying RAMFS solution with Postgres wherein I am pushing the most
> heavily used tables in RAM.
Why? I mean, what problem are you trying to solve?
> I have 32GB RAM on a 64 bit opteron machine. My database size is 40GB. I
Hi,
I am trying RAMFS solution with Postgres wherein I am pushing the most
heavily used tables in RAM.
I have 32GB RAM on a 64 bit opteron machine. My database size is 40GB. I
think Linux allows max. of 16GB (half of available RAM) to be used directly
to push tables to it.
I am concerned ab
