> I wish Postgresql users were more outspoken -
>
> This page - http://openacs.org/philosophy/why-not-mysql.html
> and reading Bruce Momjian's pdf book - completely changed me
>
> I always heard comments like - "you don't need transactions" "you can
> get away with no subqueries" - "MYsql is go
On 2001.01.18 17:31:29 +0100 Lamar Owen wrote:
> Tony Grant wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > That can't be good for PostgreSQL, can it?
> >
> > Neither can not being able to do rpm -Uvh and have it work first
> time...
>
> H... When was the last time you tried?
Yesterday...
The RedHat 6.2 rpms ar
Tony Grant wrote:
>
>
> > > That can't be good for PostgreSQL, can it?
>
> Neither can not being able to do rpm -Uvh and have it work first time...
H... When was the last time you tried?
Thanks to the 'Do No Harm' principle, it would be foolhardy to do what
has to be done to upgrade betwe
> > That can't be good for PostgreSQL, can it?
Neither can not being able to do rpm -Uvh and have it work first time...
Nor not finding a Dreamweaver Ultradev database connection for Postgresql
in the live data menu when there is a Mysql one...
Nor not being able to find somewhere to get a Po
Agree 100%
-Original Message-
From: Philip Hallstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2001 10:05
To: PostgreSQL General
Subject: Why is there so much MySQL bashing???
> What are my impressions going to be of PostgreSQL (and now Great Bridge
> since their name will pop up as w
Philip Hallstrom wrote:
>
> You're right of course, I should have left that out... but my point is
> still valid.
Pointing out the serious limitations in MySQL is not, IMHO, bashing.
MySQL currently has serious limitations for many RDBMS uses.
Concurrent performance under industry-standard ben