Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you confirm that it is OK now? Your email from October 18th below
seems to indicate it is not correct. Can I get a diff against the
current CVS source that I can apply? Thanks. Sorry for the confusion.
It wasn't okay before I left to Kenya on
Thanks you so much. I am sorry for the mixup. We will get it in there
ASAP when it arrives.
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you confirm that it is OK now? Your email from October 18th below
seems to indicate it is not correct. Can I get a diff against the
current CVS
On 18 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
Peter Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
couldn't produce a full patch using cvs diff -c this time since I have
created new files and anonymous cvs usage doesn't allow you to
adds. I'm supplying the modified src/interfaces/jdbc as a tarball at :
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Keith L. Musser wrote:
jdbc7.0-1.2.jar 1.89 ms5.0 ms 3.9 ms
postgresql.jar (191450 bytes)1.36 ms3.1 ms 3.2 ms
postgresql.jar (204223 bytes)1.78 ms3.9 ms 4.1 ms
In Test #2 w/ GC, I purposefully ran System.gc() every 150
AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance
On 9 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Applied, and new files added.
Scares me ;-) I just wanted to get some feedback and testers for this
code
before actually having it applied. I can also imagine
:55 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance
On 9 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Applied, and new files added.
Scares me ;-) I just wanted to get some feedback and testers for this
code
before actually having it applied. I can also imagine
"Keith L. Musser" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did try out Peter's new JDBC driver on two very simple query-only
applications. It was about 15% slower on one of the apps and 10% faster
on the other, compared with jdbc7.0-1.2.jar. It worked correctly on
both tests.
Neither is particularly
Applied, and new files added.
Peter Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anything of this nature always does.
Okay, I have some new code in place that hopefully should work better. I
couldn't produce a full patch using cvs diff -c this time since I have
created new files and
On 2 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
Peter Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Our concurrency is done by locking against the pg_Stream object. As there
is only one per connection this works (as it prevents the network protocol
from getting messed up).
The pool of free byte arrays
On 2 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
Peter Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For JDBC2, I'm planning (may get done for 7.1) an alternate ResultSet
class that uses cursors. This would speed things up as the entire
resultset isn't received in one go. That's the biggest bottleneck of them
On 2 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
Peter Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm now off work for the next two weeks (off sick that is), so I'll have
some more time now to get the driver up to date. I'm finishing off the
outstanding stuff now, so this should be in CVS today (finally ;-) )
03, 2000 4:57 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance
On 2 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
Peter Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm now off work for the next two weeks (off sick that is), so I'll
have
some more time now to get the driver up to date. I'm finishing off
]; PostgreSQL general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Keith L. Musser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 4:57 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance
On 2 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
Peter Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm now off work for the next two
)
- Keith
-Original Message-
From: Gunnar R|nning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Keith L. Musser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re
"Keith L. Musser" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gunnar,
Your new JDBC driver (postgresql.jar, 29-Sept-2000, 14:47, 187K) caused
the following error.
Thanks, I will look into the problem. The regression tests that Peter Mount
talking about would have been nice to have to catch things like
"Keith L. Musser" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gunnar,
Your new JDBC driver (postgresql.jar, 29-Sept-2000, 14:47, 187K) caused
the following error.
SELECT host, port FROM Servers WHERE PID=1;
Bad Integer int4
at org.postgresql.jdbc2.ResultSet.getInt(ResultSet.java:261)
at
On 28 Sep 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm finding that ... my CPU spends about 60% of the time in JDBC, and about
40% of the time in the postmaster backend.
(Each query takes 2 msec on my machine, RH Linux 6.2, 733 MHz Intel, w/
lots of
The performance of my client Java app using JDBC to access PGSL is very
finicky. Sometimes it's fast, and sometimes it's slow, depending on how
much memory I'm allocating in my program.
This appears to be an issue with the JVM I'm using on Linux.
Performance is very consistent using HotSpot
18 matches
Mail list logo
