Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>> 2.Our production PG version is 8.1.3. For some reasons it is not possible
> to
> >> upgrade to the LATEST;
> >>> I tested the libpq also on this version and it worked. Is it OK? I mean,
> did
> >> it worked by chance or the library
> >>> API & contracts didn't change b
Magnus Hagander wrote
> Tom Tom wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> =?us-ascii?Q?Tom=20Tom?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Attached is a pg_restore.exe off CVS tip today, which should include the
> > patch. Please try this one.
>
=?us-ascii?Q?Tom=20Tom?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Attached is a pg_restore.exe off CVS tip today, which should include the
>> patch. Please try this one.
> I tested the restore using the provided pg_restore.exe. The output is:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I wrote:
> >> Of course the larger issue is why it's failing --- 150MB doesn't seem
> >> like that much for a modern machine. I suspect that PQerrorMessage()
> >> would tell us something useful, but pg_restore isn't letting us see it.
> >
> > I've appl
I wrote:
> Of course the larger issue is why it's failing --- 150MB doesn't seem
> like that much for a modern machine. I suspect that PQerrorMessage()
> would tell us something useful, but pg_restore isn't letting us see it.
I've applied a patch for the latter issue. But the only way we can fin
=?us-ascii?Q?Tom=20Tom?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Can you set up a reproducible test-case that doesn't involve your data,
> - test row was inserted using the Java client code
> INSERT INTO hibtableattachmentxmldata VALUES (?,?,?)
> where value 1 is ""
> value 2 i
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Tom Tom wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Tom Tom wrote:
> Tom Tom wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We have a very strange problem when restoring a database on Windows XP.
> > The PG version is 8.1.10
> > The backup was made with the pg_dump on the sa
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Tom Tom wrote:
> >> Tom Tom wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> We have a very strange problem when restoring a database on Windows XP.
> >>> The PG version is 8.1.10
> >>> The backup was made with the pg_dump on the same machine.
> >>>
> >>> pg_restore -F c -h localhost -p 543
