Can anyone advise me if either PostgreSQL 8.3 or 8.4 is ready for
special case of production use?
I'm considering using the windows version PostgreSQL in the following
conditions:
at least 10 years of up time (with periodic power failures = 1 a year)
single table with less-than 50 record inserts
On 5/12/2010 11:45 AM, Richard Broersma wrote:
Can anyone advise me if either PostgreSQL 8.3 or 8.4 is ready for
special case of production use?
I'm considering using the windows version PostgreSQL in the following
conditions:
at least 10 years of up time (with periodic power failures= 1
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Justin Graf jus...@magwerks.com wrote:
I would do a plain text file something like XML. Given this is for
industrial use 10 years is a good number for warranty and support, but
this stuff will hang around years later, think 20 to 30 years. How
many people
On 5/12/2010 12:33 PM, Richard Broersma wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Justin Grafjus...@magwerks.com wrote:
I would do a plain text file something like XML. Given this is for
industrial use 10 years is a good number for warranty and support, but
this stuff will hang around
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Richard Broersma
richard.broer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Justin Graf jus...@magwerks.com wrote:
I would do a plain text file something like XML. Given this is for
industrial use 10 years is a good number for warranty and
I use both PostgreSQL and SQLite in my job. I have mixed feelings about
SQLite. If you play by its rules, it works very well, but I think you
have to understand its rules well. If you do not set up your indexes
correctly and do not use transactions correctly, performance can be
horrible, but if
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 13:45 -0400, Rob Richardson wrote:
I use both PostgreSQL and SQLite in my job. I have mixed feelings
about SQLite. If you play by its rules, it works very well, but I
think you have to understand its rules well. If you do not set up
your indexes correctly and do not
Richard Broersma wrote on 12.05.2010 17:45:
I'm considering using the windows version PostgreSQL in the following
conditions:
at least 10 years of up time (with periodic power failures= 1 a year)
I don't think you can get 10 years of up time on a Windows Server.
Most of the security patches
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Thomas Kellerer spam_ea...@gmx.net wrote:
Richard Broersma wrote on 12.05.2010 17:45:
I'm considering using the windows version PostgreSQL in the following
conditions:
at least 10 years of up time (with periodic power failures= 1 a year)
I don't think you
To yank this thread in yet another direction:
The question of 8.3 vs 8.4 brings up a very irritating issue we have
with one client. Originally, we had installed PostgreSQL 8.3 on his
system. There is a program we occasionally have to use that requires us
to use mstsc /console to connect to his
10 matches
Mail list logo
