On 02/11/2009 19:47, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:06 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>>> I fully agree that it's broken, but my users just see the delay. I
>>> might have to try some sort of proxy arrangement.
>> This is not your problem. Treating it as though it were your problem
>> wi
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:06 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>> I fully agree that it's broken, but my users just see the delay. I
>> might have to try some sort of proxy arrangement.
>
> This is not your problem. Treating it as though it were your problem
> will only lead to enormous pain to you, and w
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 08:57:03AM +1100, Phil Cairns wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Phil Cairns" writes:
> > > I want to have the server do this: If the query has no where
> > > clause, use a where clause of "where 1=0".
> >
> > > Is this possible?
> >
> > It's doubtless *possible*, but if you'r
Oh, nevermind, read the thread again.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Phil Cairns wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Tell the library authors to fix their broken code. This is blithering
>>> stupidity in *any* SQL database, not only Postgres.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Phil Cairns wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Tell the library authors to fix their broken code. This is blithering
>> stupidity in *any* SQL database, not only Postgres.
>
> Tried that, and got no response. I fully agree that it's broken, but my
> users just see the de
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Phil Cairns wrote:
> I want to have the server do this:
>
> If the query has no where clause, use a where clause of "where 1=0".
>
> Is this possible?
Anyway to add a 'limit 1' to the end of the query somewhere on the app
side? Like Tom said, this app sounds reta
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Phil Cairns" writes:
> > I want to have the server do this:
> > If the query has no where clause, use a where clause of "where 1=0".
>
> > Is this possible?
>
> It's doubtless *possible*, but if you're asking for it to actually
> happen in any supported version of Postgres, th
"Phil Cairns" writes:
> I want to have the server do this:
> If the query has no where clause, use a where clause of "where 1=0".
> Is this possible?
It's doubtless *possible*, but if you're asking for it to actually
happen in any supported version of Postgres, the answer is no way.
It's direct
I want to have the server do this:
If the query has no where clause, use a where clause of "where 1=0".
Is this possible?
Why would I want to do this? Because a third party library (ArcGIS) has a
"feature" such that when a relation name is registered with it, it does a
"select * from " and then
