Re: [GENERAL] Server choice for small workload : raptors or SSD?

2012-03-23 Thread Vick Khera
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange r...@campbell-lange.net wrote: I'd be grateful for comments on whether to go with a server with the A or B spec. Both servers have the following in common:    E5620 Quad-Core / 4x 2.40GHz    LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-4i with BBU (6Gbps)    48

[GENERAL] Server choice for small workload : raptors or SSD?

2012-03-21 Thread Rory Campbell-Lange
I presently have about 40 databases on an aging server which runs both Postgresql and Apache. The databases presently consume about 20GB and I expect them to be consuming around 40GB in a year or more if demand for our services expand as we hope. The present database is 2 x Quad core E5420 Xeon

Re: [GENERAL] Server choice for small workload : raptors or SSD?

2012-03-21 Thread David Boreham
We've used Raptors in production for a few years. They've been about as reliable as you'd expect for hard drives, with the additional excitement of a firmware bug early on that led to data loss and considerable expense. New machines deployed since November last year have 710 SSDs. No problems