On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 08:40:27PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Graeme Merrall wrote:
Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
number of people invariably tell that they are using MySQL because it's
easier to install, and that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
huh? all i do is './configure;make;make install' ...
And what about CVS?
Have you changed the CVSROOT since it was changed between 7.0.0 and
7.0.2?
My nightly CVS mirrors have worked perfectly for a long time -- that is,
once I got the CVSROOT change properly
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
J.R. Belding wrote:
#mysql has much more activity than does #postgresql, and since I prefer
this method of communication over mailing-lists, I found this to be very
much in MySQL's favor.
Hmm. So which server do most postgresql people hang
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 12:24:20AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
number of people invariably tell that they are using MySQL because it's
easier to install, and that PostgreSQL is difficult ("a pain") to install.
I've
Once I ran into a guy who said that the postgres rpm was broken in Red Hat
5.2. This was when I was first getting into postgres. I spent some time
with it and realized that there were a number of things that had to be
done before it would work: creating the postgres users, initializing the
Travis Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Once I ran into a guy who said that the postgres rpm was broken in Red Hat
5.2. This was when I was first getting into postgres. I spent some time
with it and realized that there were a number of things that had to be
done before it would work:
Travis Bauer wrote:
Once I ran into a guy who said that the postgres rpm was broken in Red Hat
5.2. This was when I was first getting into postgres. I spent some time
with it and realized that there were a number of things that had to be
done before it would work: creating the postgres
"Prasanth A. Kumar" wrote:
Travis Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Once I ran into a guy who said that the postgres rpm was broken in Red Hat
5.2. This was when I was first getting into postgres. I spent some time
with it and realized that there were a number of things that had to be
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Lamar Owen wrote:
And, if most people's experience with the RedHat 5.2 RPM's is what
they're going on, they need to get with the program -- RH 5.2 shipped
PostgreSQL *6.3.2* which is absolutely ancient. Although, at the time,
6.3.2 was better than nothing.
Hello Lamar,
P.S. My tolerance is negligible for anything that goes "beep" the way
mysql insists on doing when giving error messages. Like anyone needs
that when they're trying to figure out SQL syntax! Having to figure
out SQL syntax is pennance enough, surely ...
MySQL beeps at you on an error. Ewe.
Bruce Momjian writes:
OK, thanks to the www.phpbuilder.com PostgreSQL/MySQL comparison, there
is another PostgreSQL/MySQL thread on shashdot.org. Looks interesting,
and of course, we are looking good too.
Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
number of people
11 matches
Mail list logo
