On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Vincent de Phily
vincent.deph...@mobile-devices.fr wrote:
On Monday 08 December 2014 10:17:37 Jeff Janes wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Vincent de Phily
I don't think that routine vacuums even attempts to update relfrozenxid,
or
at least doesn't
On Tuesday 09 December 2014 01:58:11 Vincent de Phily wrote:
On Monday 08 December 2014 10:17:37 Jeff Janes wrote:
You can `strace` for the lseek command to see which file handles it is
currently working on, and
use lsof to turn those into names. You want to look at where it is in the
Vincent de Phily vincent.deph...@mobile-devices.fr writes:
It reads about 8G of the table (often doing a similar number of writes, but
not always), then starts reading the pkey index and the second index (only 2
indexes on this table), reading both of them fully (some writes as well, but
On Tuesday 09 December 2014 16:56:39 Tom Lane wrote:
Vincent de Phily vincent.deph...@mobile-devices.fr writes:
It reads about 8G of the table (often doing a similar number of writes,
but
not always), then starts reading the pkey index and the second index (only
2 indexes on this table),
Vincent de Phily vincent.deph...@mobile-devices.fr writes:
What happens when vacuum is killed before it had time to go though the index
with its dead-TID buffer ?
The next run will go through the index again, looking for those same TIDs
(and possibly more).
regards,
Hi List,
I have a autovacuum: VACUUM ANALYZE public.some_big_table (to prevent
wraparound) that has been running for over 13 days. The process is consuming
IO so I'm confident it isn't stuck, but it's still taking surprisingly long.
PG 9.1.13 on Debian.
The actual table is 584G on a SAN, plus
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Vincent de Phily
vincent.deph...@mobile-devices.fr wrote:
Hi List,
I have a autovacuum: VACUUM ANALYZE public.some_big_table (to prevent
wraparound) that has been running for over 13 days. The process is
consuming
IO so I'm confident it isn't stuck, but it's
On Monday 08 December 2014 10:17:37 Jeff Janes wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Vincent de Phily
bloat, which I'd like to get back asap). Currently about 80% of the IO is
devoted to the vacuum process (on average throughout the day, as
extrapolated
from atop output).
Is that
