On Friday 29 June 2007 13:47, Erik Jones wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Erik Jones wrote:
> >> On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 16:00 -0500, Erik Jones wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Sim
On Jun 29, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Erik Jones wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 16:00 -0500, Erik Jones wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
If I'm correct, then for large databases wherei
On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Erik Jones wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 16:00 -0500, Erik Jones wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
If I'm correct, then for large databases wherein it can
take hours to take a base backup, is ther
On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 16:00 -0500, Erik Jones wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
If I'm correct, then for large databases wherein it can
take hours to take a base backup, is there anything to be gained by
using incrementally
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 16:00 -0500, Erik Jones wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> If I'm correct, then for large databases wherein it can
> >> take hours to take a base backup, is there anything to be gained by
> >> using incrementally updated backups?
> >
> > If you are
On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 13:42 -0500, Erik Jones wrote:
It is my understanding that once a standby server has reached the
point where it is often waiting for wal files to replay, it is pretty
much caught up to the primary server, with the differenc
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 13:42 -0500, Erik Jones wrote:
> It is my understanding that once a standby server has reached the
> point where it is often waiting for wal files to replay, it is pretty
> much caught up to the primary server, with the differences being in
> whatever wal files are curr
It is my understanding that once a standby server has reached the
point where it is often waiting for wal files to replay, it is pretty
much caught up to the primary server, with the differences being in
whatever wal files are currently in queue to be archived by the
primary. If I'm correc
