On 03/10/2015 08:20 AM, Andrzej Pilacik wrote:
I see the issues that this person might be having. I am not doing a
restore or working on an existing issue.
I know, but the thread actually covers the same ground. If you want to
learn exactly what happens with FKs and users in Postgres read Tom
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Andrzej Pilacik wrote:
>
> I see the issues that this person might be having. I am not doing a
> restore or working on an existing issue.
>
> My setup is very vanilla, anyone can create these tables and test, will
> g
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Andrzej Pilacik
wrote:
> I see the issues that this person might be having. I am not doing a
> restore or working on an existing issue.
>
> My setup is very vanilla, anyone can create these tables and test, will
> get the same permission error... (I did it in a
I see the issues that this person might be having. I am not doing a
restore or working on an existing issue.
My setup is very vanilla, anyone can create these tables and test, will get
the same permission error... (I did it in a brand new environment)
What I am asking here is why does a SUPERUS
On 03/10/2015 05:41 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Andrzej Pilacik (cypise...@gmail.com) wrote:
Can anyone explain how the FK constraint function works? Is it executed as
the owner of the object. That is the only thing that would make sense for
me.
Yes.
This brought back a memory. For the how
* Andrzej Pilacik (cypise...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Can anyone explain how the FK constraint function works? Is it executed as
> the owner of the object. That is the only thing that would make sense for
> me.
Yes.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Yes, it was a typo by me, the second insert should read:
> --- Insert as superuser
> delete from ap.table1
> Insert into ap.table1 values (12) --- permission issue inserting into table1
> , (SUPERUSER can't access schema ap)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:18 AM, PT wrote:
>
> I've read this email
I've read this email over multiple times, and I don't understand
what your question is. I don't see what it is that you think is
working in an unexpected way, all the situations I see described
you claim work. Did you possible forget to put something in the
email or am I just a poor reader?
On Mo
I ran into this yesterday and I wanted to post this to see if this is
working as expected or it is a bug.
By creating 2 tables and creating a FK between them and then changing the
owner of the tables to a group, I lost the ability to insert into the first
table executing as SUPERUSER.
I thought th
