Hi,
On 9 March 2012 02:23, dennis jenkins wrote:
> I've also looked at the Fusion-IO products. They are not standard
> flash drives. They don't appear as SATA devices. They contains an
> FPGA that maps the flash directly to the PCI bus. The kernel-mode
> drivers blits data to/from them via DM
I've also looked at the Fusion-IO products. They are not standard
flash drives. They don't appear as SATA devices. They contains an
FPGA that maps the flash directly to the PCI bus. The kernel-mode
drivers blits data to/from them via DMA, not a SATA or SAS drive (that
would limit transfer rates
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> My company is in the process of migrating to a new pair of servers, running
> 9.1.
>
> The database performance monetary transactions, we require
> synchronous_commit on for all transactions.
>
> Fusion-io is being considered, but will it giv
My company is in the process of migrating to a new pair of servers, running 9.1.
The database performance monetary transactions, we require
synchronous_commit on for all transactions.
Fusion-io is being considered, but will it give any significant
performance gain compared to normal SATA-based SS
