Re: [GENERAL] Table Column Retrieval

2010-02-22 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:23:09PM -0700, dmp wrote: >> >> Recently I read that one of the distinctions between a standard database >> and >> a columnar one, which led to an increase in its efficiency, was and I >> quote: >> >> "Only relevant

Re: [GENERAL] Table Column Retrieval

2010-02-22 Thread Joshua Tolley
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:23:09PM -0700, dmp wrote: > > Recently I read that one of the distinctions between a standard database > and > a columnar one, which led to an increase in its efficiency, was and I > quote: > > "Only relevant columns are retrieved (A row-wise database would pull > all

[GENERAL] Table Column Retrieval

2010-02-22 Thread dmp
Recently I read that one of the distinctions between a standard database and a columnar one, which led to an increase in its efficiency, was and I quote: "Only relevant columns are retrieved (A row-wise database would pull all columns and typically discard 80-95% of them)" Is this true of