Re: [GENERAL] Table size for partitioned setup

On 03/28/2016 02:55 PM, Mat Arye wrote: This will run on EC2 (or other cloud service) machines and on ssds. Right now runs on m4.4xlarge with 64GiB of ram. Willing to pay for beefy instances if it means better performance. On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Rob Sargent

Re: [GENERAL] Table size for partitioned setup

This will run on EC2 (or other cloud service) machines and on ssds. Right now runs on m4.4xlarge with 64GiB of ram. Willing to pay for beefy instances if it means better performance. On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Rob Sargent wrote: > > > On 03/28/2016 02:41 PM, Mat

Re: [GENERAL] Table size for partitioned setup

On 03/28/2016 02:41 PM, Mat Arye wrote: Hi All, I am writing a program that needs time-series-based insert mostly workload. I need to make the system scaleable with many thousand of inserts/s. One of the techniques I plan to use is time-based table partitioning and I am trying to figure

[GENERAL] Table size for partitioned setup

Hi All, I am writing a program that needs time-series-based insert mostly workload. I need to make the system scaleable with many thousand of inserts/s. One of the techniques I plan to use is time-based table partitioning and I am trying to figure out how large to make my time tables. Does