Re: [GENERAL] Tom thinks it's bad code was 8.3 vs 8.2 sql compatibility issue

2007-11-17 Thread Tom Hart
Joshua D. Drake wrote: in the least. If you post publicly something that is that ugly, then it is going to get critiqued. It is that simple. You don't like it, don't post. I have more than once taken my beatings on this list. It is time for you to either grow a thicker skin or unsubscribe. Jo

Re: [GENERAL] Tom thinks it's bad code was 8.3 vs 8.2 sql compatibility issue

2007-11-15 Thread Stephen Frost
Tony, * Tony Caduto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > You guys really should keep such kind words to yourself. Not sure how in > the hell you can say its bad code when it is just a little piece. You don't > even know what it does. Erm, I'm pretty confident Tom knows exactly what it does. It's not e

[GENERAL] Tom thinks it's bad code was 8.3 vs 8.2 sql compatibility issue

2007-11-15 Thread Tony Caduto
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: case when cast(a.attnum as text) IN( select array_to_string(conkey,',') from pg_constraint where Surely that's the worst bit of SQL code I've seen in awhile. Wow, you really are lucky.

Re: [GENERAL] Tom thinks it's bad code was 8.3 vs 8.2 sql compatibility issue

2007-11-15 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:17:21 -0600 Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You guys really should keep such kind words to yourself. > Not sure how in the hell you can say its bad code when it is just a > little piece. You pasted the entire SQL st