Joshua D. Drake wrote:
BSD is dying.
We all are, sooner or later ;)
--
Guy Rouillier
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:55 -0500, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
> > Robert Treat wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
> > >
> > >> Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:55 -0500, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
> >
> >> Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In contrast,
> >> Debian has a much slower release cycle than Ubuntu and is thus
> >>
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
>
>> Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In contrast,
>> Debian has a much slower release cycle than Ubuntu and is thus
>> considered by many people to be preferable for production server
>> appli
2008/12/10 Liraz Siri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
>>> Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In contrast,
>>> Debian has a much slower release cycle than Ubuntu and is thus
>>> considered by many people to
Liraz Siri wrote:
Solaris is awesome (dtrace rocks!), but I still prefer Debian/Linux for
the same reasons I prefer PostgreSQL over MySQL - its lack of dependence
on any single company.
OpenSolaris?
--
Guy Rouillier
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
>> Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In contrast,
>> Debian has a much slower release cycle than Ubuntu and is thus
>> considered by many people to be preferable for production server
>> applicatio
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
> Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In contrast,
> Debian has a much slower release cycle than Ubuntu and is thus
> considered by many people to be preferable for production server
> applications.
>
Another option for
Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In contrast,
Debian has a much slower release cycle than Ubuntu and is thus
considered by many people to be preferable for production server
applications.
This is one of the reasons we plan on releasing appliances that are
based on Debian
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Scott Marlowe wrote:
Are you familiar with this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/linux/+bug/245779
It's the reason my latest db servers are running Centos 5.2, sadly.
By the time I'd found the suggested workaround of setting a boot
option of NO_HZ=y I was alrea
10 matches
Mail list logo
