Thank you for "quiesced vs non-quiesced". I will ask the company providing the
VM.
Regards,
Thomas Güttler
Am 21.09.2017 um 03:48 schrieb Michael Paquier:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Thomas Güttler wrote:
We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
The v
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:14:23 +0200, "Klaus P. Pieper"
wrote:
>I am aware that VSS is purely Windows, and your comment about VSS aware
>application is true. Backup programs / VM managers like Data Protection
>Manager trigger these applications to put the files into a safe state
>prior to the snaps
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> ow...@postgresql.org] Im Auftrag von George Neuner
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. September 2017 18:35
>
> I can't speak for all VM managers, but Vmware's standard static
snapshots
> *do* capture bot
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:24:05 +0200, "Klaus P. Pieper"
wrote:
>> Von: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
>> ow...@postgresql.org] Im Auftrag von George Neuner
>>
>> But VSS is needed only to copy VM files *while* they are in
>> use. If you snapshot the VM, the snapshot file
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Thomas Güttler wrote:
>> We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
>>
>> The virtual machine is managed by the customer.
>>
>> He does backup the VM.
>>
>> Is this enough, is this safe?
>
> I don't know about VMware,
I heard about
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> ow...@postgresql.org] Im Auftrag von Moreno Andreo
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. September 2017 17:42
> I may be wrong, as I don't know MS SQL Server, but in the way you describe it,
> you make me com
> Von: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> ow...@postgresql.org] Im Auftrag von George Neuner
>
> But VSS is needed only to copy VM files *while* they are in use. If you
> snapshot
> the VM, the snapshot files then are read-only and can be freely copied. As
> long
> as t
er 2017 10:03
>> An: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>> Betreff: [GENERAL] VM-Ware Backup of VM safe?
>>
>> We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
>>
>> The virtual machine is managed by the customer.
>>
>> He does backup the VM.
>>
>> Is
] VM-Ware Backup of VM safe?
We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
The virtual machine is managed by the customer.
He does backup the VM.
Is this enough, is this safe?
When you run MS SQL Server on Hyper-V / Windows, the SQL Server provides ist
own VSS writer responding to a taking
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> ow...@postgresql.org] Im Auftrag von Thomas Güttler
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. September 2017 10:03
> An: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Betreff: [GENERAL] VM-Ware Backup of VM
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:03:15 +0200, Thomas Güttler
wrote:
>We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
>The virtual machine is managed by the customer.
>He does backup the VM.
>
>Is this enough, is this safe?
It is "safe" if the VM is shut down first or if the backup is by
copying a poi
Il 20/09/2017 13:36, PT ha scritto:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:03:15 +0200
Thomas Güttler wrote:
We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
The virtual machine is managed by the customer.
He does backup the VM.
Is this enough, is this safe?
There are so many variables involved with d
On 9/20/17 7:36 AM, PT wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:03:15 +0200
> Thomas Güttler wrote:
>
>> We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
>>
>> The virtual machine is managed by the customer.
>>
>> He does backup the VM.
>>
>> Is this enough, is this safe?
>
> There are so many variab
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:03:15 +0200
Thomas Güttler wrote:
> We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
>
> The virtual machine is managed by the customer.
>
> He does backup the VM.
>
> Is this enough, is this safe?
There are so many variables involved with doing that ... I don't thi
Thomas Güttler wrote:
> We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
>
> The virtual machine is managed by the customer.
>
> He does backup the VM.
>
> Is this enough, is this safe?
I don't know about VMware, but the general rule is that
if the backup is truly atomic (it is guaranteed t
We run a PostgreSQL 9.6 server in a virtual machine.
The virtual machine is managed by the customer.
He does backup the VM.
Is this enough, is this safe?
Regards,
Thomas Güttler
--
Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programm
16 matches
Mail list logo