Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Large Objects

2012-01-09 Thread Radosław Smogura
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:51:24 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 07:12 +0100, Stefan Keller wrote: Hi Igor 2011/12/16 Igor Neyman wrote: > But I think, your problem is right here: > > " running VACUUM FULL pg_largeobject" > > If you are running "VACUUM FULL ..." on the tabl

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Large Objects

2012-01-06 Thread Igor Neyman
Stefan, > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Keller [mailto:sfkel...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 1:12 AM > To: Igor Neyman > Cc: Simon Windsor; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: Vacuum and Large Objects > > Hi Igor > 2011/12/16 Igor Neyman wrote: > But I think, >

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Large Objects

2012-01-06 Thread Igor Neyman
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Keller [mailto:sfkel...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 1:12 AM > To: Igor Neyman > Cc: Simon Windsor; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: Vacuum and Large Objects > > Hi Igor > 2011/12/16 Igor Neyman wrote: > But I think, > your pro

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Large Objects

2012-01-05 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 07:12 +0100, Stefan Keller wrote: > Hi Igor > 2011/12/16 Igor Neyman wrote: > But I think, > your problem is right here: > > > > " running VACUUM FULL pg_largeobject" > > > > If you are running "VACUUM FULL ..." on the table, you should follow it > > with the "REINDEX TABLE

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Large Objects

2012-01-05 Thread Stefan Keller
Hi Igor 2011/12/16 Igor Neyman wrote: > But I think, your problem is right here: > > " running VACUUM FULL  pg_largeobject" > > If you are running "VACUUM FULL ..." on the table, you should follow it with > the "REINDEX TABLE ...", at least on PG versions prior to 9.0. I'm pretty sure that VACUU

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Large Objects

2011-12-16 Thread Igor Neyman
From: Simon Windsor [mailto:simon.wind...@cornfield.me.uk] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 3:02 PM To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Vacuum and Large Objects Hi I am having problems recovering storage from a Postgres 9.05 database that is used to hold large XML blocks for a week, bef

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Large Objects

2011-12-14 Thread Craig Ringer
On 12/15/2011 04:01 AM, Simon Windsor wrote: Hi I am having problems recovering storage from a Postgres 9.05 database that is used to hold large XML blocks for a week, before they are archived off line. The main tables are partitioned in daily partitions, and these are easy to manage, howe

[GENERAL] Vacuum and Large Objects

2011-12-14 Thread Simon Windsor
Hi I am having problems recovering storage from a Postgres 9.05 database that is used to hold large XML blocks for a week, before they are archived off line. The main tables are partitioned in daily partitions, and these are easy to manage, however the DB keeps growing despite using Vacuum