Hi,
In
"Re: [GENERAL] WAL supported extension" on Sun, 18 Jan 2015 15:15:51 +0900,
Michael Paquier wrote:
>> (Is this mailing list right mailing list for asking this
>> question...?)
> Hackers would have been fine as well.
Thanks for your advice. I'll use ha
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > We are eager for development of this API.
> Yeah, me too actually :) Oleg, are there plans on your side to do
> something in this area for 9.6?
>
Yes, Alexander Korotkov will continue working on this. Are you comi
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> We are eager for development of this API.
Yeah, me too actually :) Oleg, are there plans on your side to do
something in this area for 9.6?
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.po
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> > (Is this mailing list right mailing list for asking this
> > question...?)
> Hackers would have been fine as well.
>
> > Is there any plan to implement PostgreSQL API to implement
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> (Is this mailing list right mailing list for asking this
> question...?)
Hackers would have been fine as well.
> Is there any plan to implement PostgreSQL API to implement
> WAL supported extension?
Not that I know of, the last discussion I
Hi,
(Is this mailing list right mailing list for asking this
question...?)
Is there any plan to implement PostgreSQL API to implement
WAL supported extension?
Background:
I'm writing an extension(*) that provides index module for CJK
ready fast full-text search feature.
(*) PGroonga: https://
