Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC V2

2016-01-12 Thread Regina Obe
Josh, > tl;dr; > * Modified #2 to be less harsh. > * Modified #3 with TGL and James comments > * Did not remove examples as I believe they are vital to the success > I saw Regina's post, I believe it is good for context but I also believe that > something concise and to the point is the better

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC V2

2016-01-11 Thread Joshua D. Drake
tl;dr; * Modified #2 to be less harsh. * Modified #3 with TGL and James comments * Did not remove examples as I believe they are vital to the success I saw Regina's post, I believe it is good for context but I also believe that something concise and to the point is the better path.

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC V2

2016-01-11 Thread Stephen Cook
On 1/11/2016 6:41 PM, Alban Hertroys wrote: > >> On 12 Jan 2016, at 0:16, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >> 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of >> non-technical or personal comments, for example ones related to gender, >> sexual

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC V2

2016-01-11 Thread Alban Hertroys
> On 12 Jan 2016, at 0:16, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of > non-technical or personal comments, for example ones related to gender, > sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size,