http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6100795.html
--
Tony Caduto
AM Software Design
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com
Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql
Your best bet for Postgresql Administration
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/r
Tony Caduto wrote:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6100795.html
Week late bud :) that was announced during OSCON.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehens
On 8/3/06, Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6100795.html
Let's believe that that was the real reason... :-)
"
...
In a letter to the PostgreSQL community of developers, Pervasive
Software President John Farr said last week that the company
"underestimat
I found this comment particularly telling:
Pervasive Software President John Farr said last week that the company
"underestimated the high level of quality support and expertise already
available within the PostgreSQL community."
I don't think I can add anything to that.
On 8/3/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's believe that that was the real reason... :-)
If not, what was? Is this really a commentary on how many
"enterprise"-y types are using Postgres?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't
On 8/4/06, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's believe that that was the real reason... :-)
If not, what was? Is this really a commentary on how many
"enterprise"-y types are using Postgres?
I'm afraid that many people read only the
ct: Re: [GENERAL] Well, Pervasive is now out
On 8/3/06, Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6100795.html
Let's believe that that was the real reason... :-)
"
...
In a letter to the PostgreSQL community of developers, Pervasive
Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Audette) writes:
> My guess is what this really means is they weren't making money on
> it. Its a community friendly spin to suggest that community support
> is so good that not many companies will pony up for commercial
> support. My guess is that its fairly accurate though.
On 8/3/06, Joe Audette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My guess is what this really means is they weren't making money on it. Its a
community friendly spin to suggest that community support is so good that not
many companies will pony up for commercial support. My guess is that its fairly
accurate
