Re: [GENERAL] Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names?

2012-02-01 Thread Bobby Dewitt
We get around this issue by creating a symbolic link called current that points to the version of Postgres that we want our servers to use by default: ln -s /var/lib/pgsql/9.1 /var/lib/pgsql/current The symbolic link is changed whenever we do an upgrade so it doesn't interfere with anything that

Re: [GENERAL] Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names?

2012-02-01 Thread Gregg Jaskiewicz
Its because of pg_upgrade, 'in place' upgrade capabilities that are in pg since 8.4. For that to work you need both old and new (current) set of postgresql binaries. Etc. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:

Re: [GENERAL] Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names?

2012-01-31 Thread Marti Raudsepp
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 00:41, Jerry Richards jerry.richa...@teotech.com wrote: I just installed postgreSQL 9.1 and noticed it hard-codes the folder /var/lib/pgsql/9.1 and it hard-codes the service name to be postgresql91. Why is the hard-coded version included in the naming? Note that this

[GENERAL] Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names?

2012-01-30 Thread Jerry Richards
I just installed postgreSQL 9.1 and noticed it hard-codes the folder /var/lib/pgsql/9.1 and it hard-codes the service name to be postgresql91. My previous version of 8.4.4 uses the generic folder /var/lib/pgsql/data and the generic service name postgresql. This causes a problem for me because

Re: [GENERAL] Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names?

2012-01-30 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jerry Richards jerry.richa...@teotech.com wrote: I just installed postgreSQL 9.1 and noticed it hard-codes the folder /var/lib/pgsql/9.1 and it hard-codes the service name to be postgresql91. My previous version of 8.4.4 uses the generic folder