Re: [GENERAL] Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

2011-11-03 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 13:16 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: Hey Devrim, any chance you have published your rpm spec files you used on the earlier 8.3 -id builds? I looked around and couldn't find one. They were in the previous repo -- anyway, I just update the spec file to 8.3.16:

Re: [GENERAL] Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

2011-11-03 Thread devrim
This message has been digitally signed by the sender. Re___GENERAL__Why_is_there_no_8_3_16_rpm_with__id__.eml Description: Binary data - Hi-Tech Gears Ltd, Gurgaon, India -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to

Re: [GENERAL] Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

2011-11-03 Thread Robert Treat
2011/11/3 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 13:16 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: Hey Devrim, any chance you have published your rpm spec files you used on the earlier 8.3 -id builds? I looked around and couldn't find one. They were in the previous repo -- anyway, I just

Re: [GENERAL] Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

2011-11-02 Thread Robert Treat
2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: [Moving to pgsql-general] On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:24 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer datetimes:

Re: [GENERAL] Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

2011-10-31 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages quite easily, though. ok. fair enough. thanks. Best regards, depesz -- The best

Re: [GENERAL] Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

2011-10-31 Thread Alban Hertroys
2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages quite easily, though. But... aren't integer datetimes supposed to be the default, with float datetimes

Re: [GENERAL] Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

2011-10-31 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:52:28PM +0100, Alban Hertroys wrote: 2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages quite easily, though. But...

Re: [GENERAL] Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

2011-10-30 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
[Moving to pgsql-general] On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:24 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer datetimes: