[GENERAL] Wider than float8

2007-06-08 Thread Vincenzo Romano
Hi all. On most modern CPUs there are numeric representations wider than 8-bytes (aka float8 in PGSQL). For example, Intel/AMD CPUs have native 12-bytes floating point numbers (aka long double in C/C++). I understand that it could not be non-standard from a clean SQL point of view. Nonetheless,

Re: [GENERAL] Wider than float8

2007-06-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Vincenzo Romano wrote: Hi all. On most modern CPUs there are numeric representations wider than 8-bytes (aka float8 in PGSQL). For example, Intel/AMD CPUs have native 12-bytes floating point numbers (aka long double in C/C++). I understand that it could not be non-standard from a clean

Re: [GENERAL] Wider than float8

2007-06-08 Thread felix
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:00:35PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: No. Frankly I didn't know 12-byte floats were supported in CPUs until you posted this. You could write your own data type to use it, of course. I didn't either, and have no use for them, but curiousity compels me to wonder how

Re: [GENERAL] Wider than float8

2007-06-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:00:35PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: No. Frankly I didn't know 12-byte floats were supported in CPUs until you posted this. You could write your own data type to use it, of course. I didn't either, and have no use for them, but