On 11/01/13 03:23, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Sergey Konoplev wrote:
As far as I know, the application programs do not make any
specific lock on the 'file' table. I'm not sure if it is caused
by the pgpool or something else.
[...]
2013-10-31 18:01:30 UTCLOG: sending cancel to blocking autovacu
Sergey Konoplev wrote:
>> As far as I know, the application programs do not make any
>> specific lock on the 'file' table. I'm not sure if it is caused
>> by the pgpool or something else.
>
> [...]
>
>> 2013-10-31 18:01:30 UTCLOG: sending cancel to blocking autovacuum PID 8614
>> 2013-10-31 18:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Gary Fu wrote:
> I'm running an application (with programs in Perl) through pgpool 3.1 with
> replication mode to two postgresql db servers (version 9.0.13). Recently, I
> noticed that the following messages repeatedly showed in postgres log files.
> As far as I
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Gary Fu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running an application (with programs in Perl) through pgpool 3.1 with
> replication mode to two postgresql db servers (version 9.0.13). Recently,
> I noticed that the following messages repeatedly showed in postgres log
> files.
Hello,
I'm running an application (with programs in Perl) through pgpool 3.1
with replication mode to two postgresql db servers (version 9.0.13).
Recently, I noticed that the following messages repeatedly showed in
postgres log files. As far as I know, the application programs do not
make a
