Re: [GENERAL] backend process terminates

2007-08-08 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:50:41AM -0400, Geoffrey wrote: > Correct on both counts. Many of the routines are wrapper routines used > to assist in code portability. That ok in programs, but shared libraries need to be careful not to use names likely to be used by programs that use them. FWIW, thi

Re: [GENERAL] backend process terminates

2007-08-08 Thread Geoffrey
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 07:46:45AM -0400, Geoffrey wrote: I don't know all the idiosyncrasies of how this works, so bear with me on this. The developer at the vendor indicated that he's narrowed down the problem to a set of wrapper routines in their code. They ar

Re: [GENERAL] backend process terminates

2007-08-08 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 07:46:45AM -0400, Geoffrey wrote: > I don't know all the idiosyncrasies of how this works, so bear with me > on this. The developer at the vendor indicated that he's narrowed down > the problem to a set of wrapper routines in their code. They are named > OpenFile(), Clo

Re: [GENERAL] backend process terminates

2007-08-07 Thread Geoffrey
Tom Lane wrote: Geoffrey Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The output from the gdb batch process may be found here: http://www.serioustechnology.com/gdbbatch.txt gdb isn't telling you the whole truth, evidently --- how'd control get from line 781 to 912 with nothing in between? Recompiling th

Re: [GENERAL] backend process terminates

2007-08-04 Thread Geoffrey
Tom Lane wrote: Geoffrey Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The output from the gdb batch process may be found here: http://www.serioustechnology.com/gdbbatch.txt gdb isn't telling you the whole truth, evidently --- how'd control get from line 781 to 912 with nothing in between? Recompiling th

Re: [GENERAL] backend process terminates

2007-08-04 Thread Tom Lane
Geoffrey Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The output from the gdb batch process may be found here: > http://www.serioustechnology.com/gdbbatch.txt gdb isn't telling you the whole truth, evidently --- how'd control get from line 781 to 912 with nothing in between? Recompiling the backend with -

[GENERAL] backend process terminates

2007-08-04 Thread Geoffrey Myers
We've been wrestling with a problem where the backend process terminates with a SEGSEGV. We are having a hard time tracking this thing down, so I decided to run a batch gdb process that single steps through the code until it crashes and post the output to the list for a request for assistance.