jws wrote:
Do the images take up a certain percentage more space due to the on-
disk format when stored this way?
Bytes are pretty much stored just as bytes, with four bytes of overhead
for the length field. Larger values ( 2kB) are stored out of line, so
there really shouldn't be much
Are there any known guidelines regarding storing images in a bytea
column vs simply storing the meta-data?
Do the images take up a certain percentage more space due to the on-
disk format when stored this way?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't
