Unless you have over simplified your example, why do you have two tables?
Wouldn't:
create table table1 (id int primary key, col1 int, col2 int)
do the same thing in one table? I would think that ANY schema that has two
tables with the SAME primary key can be resolved to one table without losin
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/26/2001
05:19:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Wesley Sheldahl/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: [GENERAL] concurent updates
hi everybody !
I've got a little problem when updating a primary key in two table
where the primary key of the one is a foreign key from
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Steve SAUTETNER wrote:
> hi everybody !
>
> I've got a little problem when updating a primary key in two table
> where the primary key of the one is a foreign key from the second :
>
> here are the 2 tables :
>
> create table table1 (id int primary key, col1 int);
> create
ursday, July 26, 2001 11:19 AM
Subject: [GENERAL] concurent updates
hi everybody !
I've got a little problem when updating a primary key in two table
where the primary key of the one is a foreign key from the second :
here are the 2 tables :
create table table1 (id int primary key, col1 int);
hi everybody !
I've got a little problem when updating a primary key in two table
where the primary key of the one is a foreign key from the second :
here are the 2 tables :
create table table1 (id int primary key, col1 int);
create table table2 (id int primary key references table1(id), col2 i
