Matthew Chambers wrote:
> Would something like this work best, or is it better to use pgdump?
>
> CREATE DATABASE newDatabase TEMPLATE oldDatabase ENCODING 'UTF8'
>
> Does using a template do a file system copy or just SQL copy everything over?
Using the old database as template will not change
It should take about as much time as cp -r of the directory for that
DB would take.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 10:43 AM, Matthew Chambers wrote:
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> How long did it take to complete?
>>
>
> I did not time that copy. I just tried with a s
On 10/14/2014 10:43 AM, Matthew Chambers wrote:
Thanks,
How long did it take to complete?
I did not time that copy. I just tried with a small database(76 MB on
disk) and it took 27 secs. This is using Linux on an older(3 yrs+) i386
machine.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
--
Thanks,
How long did it take to complete?
On 15/10/14 06:39, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 10/14/2014 10:31 AM, Matthew Chambers wrote:
Would something like this work best, or is it better to use pgdump?
CREATE DATABASE newDatabase TEMPLATE oldDatabase ENCODING 'UTF8'
I actually just did that fo
On 10/14/2014 10:31 AM, Matthew Chambers wrote:
Would something like this work best, or is it better to use pgdump?
CREATE DATABASE newDatabase TEMPLATE oldDatabase ENCODING 'UTF8'
I actually just did that for a database.
Does using a template do a file system copy or just SQL copy everyth
Would something like this work best, or is it better to use pgdump?
CREATE DATABASE newDatabase TEMPLATE oldDatabase ENCODING 'UTF8'
Does using a template do a file system copy or just SQL copy everything
over?
-Matt