Ok, so I think the best that can be done is to EXPLAIN the query and
check if it's gonna take long. If it is, I could use the estimated
count.
Thanks,
FabioOn 8/17/06, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Fuhr wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:34:44AM +1000, Chris wrote: Fabio Victora Hecht
Hi!I've been using Postgresql for a while now and I'm very satisfied.I was wondering if there's a way to count the results of a query and return part of the result set it in one query (LIMIT). Because I usually have to count the results using one query (to tell the user how many records match the
Fabio Victora Hecht wrote:
Hi!
I've been using Postgresql for a while now and I'm very satisfied.
I was wondering if there's a way to count the results of a query and
return part of the result set it in one query (LIMIT). Because I usually
have to count the results using one query (to tell
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fabio Victora Hecht wrote:
I was wondering if there's a way to count the results of a query and
return part of the result set it in one query (LIMIT).
I was going to suggest a cursor but I don't think you can get the number
of results a cursor has :(
In
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:34:44AM +1000, Chris wrote:
Fabio Victora Hecht wrote:
I was wondering if there's a way to count the results of a query and
return part of the result set it in one query (LIMIT). Because I usually
have to count the results using one query (to tell the user how many
Tom Lane wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fabio Victora Hecht wrote:
I was wondering if there's a way to count the results of a query and
return part of the result set it in one query (LIMIT).
I was going to suggest a cursor but I don't think you can get the number
of results a cursor
