On Sep 29, 2004, at 5:35 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Am I missing something Vivek, or should the gross hack be creating a
user with id=102 ?
And how exactly does one accomplish this? pg_users is a view so you
can't insert into it.
CREATE USER ... WITH SYSID 102;
Ok. I did that. So now how do I get
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:32:30AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Sep 29, 2004, at 5:35 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Am I missing something Vivek, or should the gross hack be creating a
user with id=102 ?
And how exactly does one accomplish this? pg_users is a view so you
can't insert into
I have a database which started on Pg 7.1, moved to 7.2 via
pg_dump/restore, and ultimately to Pg 7.4 likewise.
While it was in 7.2, I added one user and granted access to various
tables. After the 7.4 migration, that user was no longer needed, so
was removed via dropuser command line tool.
Vivek Khera wrote:
there is no user with ID 102 in the pg_user view. pg_restore complains
about the missing user 102. And no, the user was not 102 it was the
name of a (former) employee.
The gross hack is to pg_restore to an ascii file and delete those GRANT
lines, but the compressed dump is
On Sep 29, 2004, at 4:55 PM, Richard Huxton wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
there is no user with ID 102 in the pg_user view. pg_restore
complains about the missing user 102. And no, the user was not
102 it was the name of a (former) employee.
The gross hack is to pg_restore to an ascii file and
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:07:38PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Sep 29, 2004, at 4:55 PM, Richard Huxton wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
there is no user with ID 102 in the pg_user view. pg_restore
complains about the missing user 102. And no, the user was not
102 it was the name of a
Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sep 29, 2004, at 4:55 PM, Richard Huxton wrote:
Am I missing something Vivek, or should the gross hack be creating a
user with id=102 ?
And how exactly does one accomplish this?
CREATE USER.
regards, tom lane
