Re: [GENERAL] database bloat, but vacuums are done, and fsm seems to be setup ok

2005-10-01 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On 9/30/05, Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like it's definately an issue with index bloat. Note that it'snormal to have some amount of empty space depending on vacuum and updatefrequency, so 15G - 20G isn't terribly surprising. I would suggest using pg_autovacuum instead of the

Re: [GENERAL] database bloat, but vacuums are done, and fsm seems to be setup ok

2005-09-30 Thread Jim C. Nasby
Looks like it's definately an issue with index bloat. Note that it's normal to have some amount of empty space depending on vacuum and update frequency, so 15G - 20G isn't terribly surprising. I would suggest using pg_autovacuum instead of the continuous vacuum; it's very possible that some of

[GENERAL] database bloat, but vacuums are done, and fsm seems to be setup ok

2005-09-28 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
hi setup: postgresql 8.0.3 put on debian on dual xeon, 8GB ram, hardware raid. database just after recreation from dump takes 15gigabytes. after some time (up to 3 weeks) it gets really slow and has to be dump'ed and restored. as for fsm: end of vacuum info: INFO: free space map: 248 relations,