On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:09 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/8/2013 11:44 AM, zach cruise wrote:
>> anyway, on database reorganization - is it recommended to group all
>> sequences and domains under one public schema? or is a sequence tied to a
>> table as its counter?
>
> I would keep sequences
On 11/8/2013 11:44 AM, zach cruise wrote:
my response hasn't shown up on
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/upgrading-to-9-3-td5777291.html so
trying again. sorry if both show up.
anyway, on database reorganization - is it recommended to group all
sequences and domains under one public s
my response hasn't shown up on
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/upgrading-to-9-3-td5777291.html so
trying again. sorry if both show up.
anyway, on database reorganization - is it recommended to group all
sequences and domains under one public schema? or is a sequence tied to a
table as its
