On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:06:57PM -0600, Caleb Simonyi-Gindele wrote:
Yes, we use it successfully with the SQL Server edition of our product.
Does anyone know if this is available with Postgre?
Caleb
Out of the box, the answer is, No. It is not an insurmountable
problem, however, and I can
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 12:58 -0600, Caleb Simonyi-Gindele wrote:
We have a billing system and we want the ability to send users out into
the field with an unconnected (no WAN, VPN etc) laptop containing our pg
db and software. Upon their return we need to synchronize changes to the
main db.
I agree with your disagreement. This design is present in lots of
non-RDB systems - CVS, IMAP, PDA syncing, etc. It's clearly more
complicated, but can be made to work, and has been many times. I don't
see anything about databases in general, or Postgres specifically, that
indicates
We have a billing system and we want the ability to send users out into
the field with an unconnected (no WAN, VPN etc) laptop containing our pg
db and software. Upon their return we need to synchronize changes to the
main db. We would like the ability to be able to have this accomplished
at
broken.
IMO-YMMV.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Caleb
Simonyi-Gindele
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:58 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] do I need replication or something else?
We have a billing system and we want
Dann Corbit wrote:
If it were me, and someone proposed a model where two-way replication
was needed, I would tell them to rethink their model. It's broken.
I'm relatively new to PostgreSQL so won't comment about that. But some
DBMSs have this feature built in because it is a fairly common
If it were me, and someone proposed a model where two-way replication
was needed, I would tell them to rethink their model. It's broken.
I would respectfully disagree that the requirement for two-way
replication
indicates a broken design.
I agree with your disagreement. This design is present
John Burger wrote:
If it were me, and someone proposed a model where two-way replication
was needed, I would tell them to rethink their model. It's broken.
I would respectfully disagree that the requirement for two-way
replication
indicates a broken design.
I agree with your disagreement.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:00:37 -0500, John Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it were me, and someone proposed a model where two-way replication
was needed, I would tell them to rethink their model. It's broken.
I would respectfully disagree that the requirement for two-way
replication
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 16:06, Caleb Simonyi-Gindele wrote:
John Burger wrote:
If it were me, and someone proposed a model where two-way replication
was needed, I would tell them to rethink their model. It's broken.
I would respectfully disagree that the requirement for two-way
If you are using Delphi you can use the tclientdataset which has a
Briefcase type system built in.
Or you can use one of the many middleware systems that are available for
Delphi, all of which will do what you want.
www.remobjects.com
www.astatech.com
etc etc
Most of them work by creating a XML
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Caleb
Simonyi-Gindele) would write:
John Burger wrote:
If it were me, and someone proposed a model where two-way
replication was needed, I would tell them to rethink their model.
It's broken.
I would respectfully disagree that the
12 matches
Mail list logo
