Bruce Momjian wrote:
For example, one could drop literaltemplate1/ and recreate it from
literaltemplate0/ without any ill effects. This course of action
might be advisable if one has carelessly added a bunch of junk in
! literaltemplate1/. (To delete
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
For example, one could drop literaltemplate1/ and recreate it from
literaltemplate0/ without any ill effects. This course of action
might be advisable if one has carelessly added a bunch of junk in
! literaltemplate1/.
Richard P. Welty wrote:
running 8.1 on a fedora core 5 linux box, up to date so far as
i know.
this page:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/manage-ag-templatedbs.html
says the following:
Note: template1 and template0 do not have any special status beyond
the
running 8.1 on a fedora core 5 linux box, up to date so far as
i know.
this page:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/manage-ag-templatedbs.html
says the following:
Note: template1 and template0 do not have any special status beyond
the fact that the name template1 is the
Richard P. Welty wrote:
running 8.1 on a fedora core 5 linux box, up to date so far as
i know.
this page:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/manage-ag-templatedbs.html
says the following:
Note: template1 and template0 do not have any special status beyond
the fact that the
