Perfect !
Cheers,
Rémi C
2016-10-11 19:12 GMT+02:00 Julien Rouhaud :
> On 11/10/2016 19:04, Rémi Cura wrote:
> > This solution is very nice.
> > Sadly the check is inherited by the children
> > (I only want the parent to be empty, not the children).
> >
> > It seems the element that are not inhe
On 11/10/2016 19:04, Rémi Cura wrote:
> This solution is very nice.
> Sadly the check is inherited by the children
> (I only want the parent to be empty, not the children).
>
> It seems the element that are not inherited are
>
> * Indexes
> * Unique constraints
> * Primary Keys
> * Foreig
This solution is very nice.
Sadly the check is inherited by the children
(I only want the parent to be empty, not the children).
It seems the element that are not inherited are
- Indexes
- Unique constraints
- Primary Keys
- Foreign keys
- Rules and Triggers
thanks anyway for the
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Rémi Cura wrote:
> Hey dear list,
> I can't find a nice solution to enforce a necessary behaviour in my case :
> I want a parent table to remain empty.
>
> Of course I could define a trigger and return NULL in any case, but I'd like
> a more elegant approach using
Hey dear list,
I can't find a nice solution to enforce a necessary behaviour in my case :
I want a parent table to remain empty.
Of course I could define a trigger and return NULL in any case, but I'd
like a more elegant approach using check or constraints.
Any thought appreciated,
Cheers,
Rémi C