Hi Rafal,
Il 24/09/12 07:54, Rafal Pietrak ha scritto:
I did what I could - the review is on the hackers list.
Thanks! That's much appreciated.
Should I do anything else to finilize this review, like "linking" it
to the pending patch? somehow? -R
You should update the commitfest.postgresq
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 09:37 +0200, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 14:31 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Rafal Pietrak
> > > wrote:
[]
> >
> > Who can review that patch?
>
> You :^)
>
I did what I could - the r
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Gabriele Bartolini <
gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>thank you very much for taking the time to read the article and get
> into the features proposed with our patch.
You are welcome. Also in case there is ambiguity, the feature I wa
Hi Chris,
thank you very much for taking the time to read the article and get
into the features proposed with our patch.
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:17:56 -0700, Chris Travers
wrote:
So those are the cautions and why I don't think a feature like this
is suitable for routine usage, but truth b
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 18:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak writes:
> > postmaster/postmaster.o: In function `PostmasterMain':^M
> > postmaster.c:(.text+0x4bc8): undefined reference to `optreset'^M
> > tcop/postgres.o: In function `process_postgres_switches':^M
> > postgres.c:(.text+0x1422)
Ciao Rafal,
You can download the refreshed version of the patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1347983571.11539.14.ca...@greygoo.devise-it.lan
5. where do I get current-v9.3 from?
git clone git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
cd postgresql
git checkout -b aefk
bzcat Arra
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Gabriele Bartolini <
gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it> wrote:
> Hi Rafal,
>
> Il 18/09/12 13:00, Rafal Pietrak ha scritto:
>
> I did have a look, and feel slightly encouraged reading: "Many people
>> feel that they're not qualified"; yes, that's me all right. Ser
Rafal Pietrak writes:
> postmaster/postmaster.o: In function `PostmasterMain':^M
> postmaster.c:(.text+0x4bc8): undefined reference to `optreset'^M
> tcop/postgres.o: In function `process_postgres_switches':^M
> postgres.c:(.text+0x1422): undefined reference to `optreset'^M
> utils/misc/ps_status.
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 15:38 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> > where do I get current-v9.3 from?
>
> At this point 9.3 just means the HEAD of the master branch of the
> git repository, which is where development for the next major
> release of software is always done. For d
Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> where do I get current-v9.3 from?
At this point 9.3 just means the HEAD of the master branch of the
git repository, which is where development for the next major
release of software is always done. For details of the public git
repository see:
http://git.postgresql.org/
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 15:12 +0200, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
> Hi Rafal,
[]
>
> It is such a coincidence that yesterday I had started to write this
> article
> (http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/postgresql-9-3-development-array-element-foreign-keys/)
>
> about this feature for 9.3
Hi Rafal,
Il 18/09/12 13:00, Rafal Pietrak ha scritto:
I did have a look, and feel slightly encouraged reading: "Many people
feel that they're not qualified"; yes, that's me all right. Serously,
I will try to do by best ... by the weekend, when I get some spare time.
It is such a coincidence
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 09:37 +0200, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak wrote:
[--]
> >
> > Who can review that patch?
>
> You :^)
;7
OK. (still smiling a little)
[---]
> Here is information about what is required:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
>
>
> You :^)
>
> The list of patches for the commitfest is here:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=15
>
> There is no reviewer for "Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys" yet.
>
> Silly question perhaps better saved for the re
Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 14:31 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Rafal Pietrak
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:58 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > >> On 09/17/2012 04:46 PM, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> > > [--]
> > >> There was so
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 14:31 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Rafal Pietrak
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:58 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> >> On 09/17/2012 04:46 PM, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> > [--]
> >> There was some quite recent discussion on ELEME
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:58 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 09/17/2012 04:46 PM, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> [--]
>> There was some quite recent discussion on ELEMENT foreign keys on the
>> -hackers list. Try searching pgsql-hackers f
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:58 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 09/17/2012 04:46 PM, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
[--]
> There was some quite recent discussion on ELEMENT foreign keys on the
> -hackers list. Try searching pgsql-hackers for ELEMENT foreign key.
>
> See:
>https://commitfest.pos
On 09/17/2012 04:46 PM, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
Hello the list,
recently I'm cooking a database for an application, that I feel is best
implemented with tables containing arrays.
I have found some related info here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-09/msg01356.php
although the in
Hello the list,
recently I'm cooking a database for an application, that I feel is best
implemented with tables containing arrays.
I have found some related info here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-09/msg01356.php
although the initial advice in that thread was: not to use ar
20 matches
Mail list logo
