hubert depesz lubaczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 58241 postgres CALL poll(0x7fffd4e0,0x1,0x7d0)
> 58241 postgres RET poll -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
> 58241 postgres CALL poll(0x7fffd4e0,0x1,0x7d0)
> 58241 postgres RET poll -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
> 5824
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 05:13:59PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> Use the kdump utility to convert the ktrace.out file to something usable.
> Something like "kdump > ktrace.txt" will probably get you what you want,
> assuming your ktrace file is ktrace.out.
ok. did it. in about 7 seconds, i got 250mb
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:35:24 +0200
hubert depesz lubaczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:22:26AM -0300, Rodrigo Gonzalez wrote:
> > So, read man page, and at least ktrace -C and read the output at
> > ktrace.out file.
>
> ok, i've read it and didn't understand. it says
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:22:26AM -0300, Rodrigo Gonzalez wrote:
> So, read man page, and at least ktrace -C and read the output at
> ktrace.out file.
ok, i've read it and didn't understand. it says how to disable tracing
but it doesn't say anything about enabling tracing.
yesterday ktrace -p p
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:04:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anything unusual about this DB (lots of tables, for instance)?
sorry, missed that question - nothing unusual. couple of dbs (10-15),
around 20 tables per databases, only 1 database really used - all others
tend to be used only for testing
hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:37:45PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>> Just in case you're not a FreeBSD expert, it's ktrace on FreeBSD. strace
>> is the Linux equivalent.
>
> i'm not an freebsd expert.
>
> i ran ktrace -p - it exited immediately.
> then i ran ktrace
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:37:45PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> Just in case you're not a FreeBSD expert, it's ktrace on FreeBSD. strace
> is the Linux equivalent.
i'm not an freebsd expert.
i ran ktrace -p - it exited immediately.
then i ran ktrace -p -f stats.ktrace.log -t\+
and it also exited
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:04:19 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > friend asked me to setup replication on their machines, and i noticed
> > that one of cpus (2 quad xeons) is used to 100%:
> > pgsql 58241 99.0 0.2 22456 7432 ??
hubert depesz lubaczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> friend asked me to setup replication on their machines, and i noticed
> that one of cpus (2 quad xeons) is used to 100%:
> pgsql 58241 99.0 0.2 22456 7432 ?? Rs Thu10AM 1530:35.93 postgres:
> stats collector process(postgres)
Hmm,
hi
first of all - i know next to nothing about bsd.
friend asked me to setup replication on their machines, and i noticed
that one of cpus (2 quad xeons) is used to 100%:
pgsql 58241 99.0 0.2 22456 7432 ?? Rs Thu10AM 1530:35.93 postgres: stats
collector process(postgres)
what might be
10 matches
Mail list logo
