Re: [GENERAL] indexing with lower(...) -> queries are not optimised very well - Please Help

2004-01-19 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 January 2004 21:50 > To: Martin Hampl > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Cave-Ayland > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] indexing with lower(...) -> queries > are not optimised very well - Please He

Re: [GENERAL] indexing with lower(...) -> queries are not optimised very well - Please Help

2003-11-26 Thread Martin Hampl
Am 21.11.2003 um 06:54 schrieb Tom Lane: Martin Hampl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Index Scan using word_lower_idx on token (cost=0.00..98814.08 rows=25382 width=16) Index Cond: (lower((word)::text) = 'saxophone'::text) The rows estimate (and therefore also the cost estimate) is a complete g

[GENERAL] indexing with lower(...) -> queries are not optimised very well - Please Help

2003-11-18 Thread Martin Hampl
Hi, I am using PostgreSQL 7.4, but I did have the same problem with the last version. I indexed the column word (defined as varchar(64)) using lower(word). If I use the following query, everything is fine, the index is used and the query is executed very quickly: select * from token where