Re: [GENERAL] is it tcl problem or pg problem?

2001-08-27 Thread newsreader
len morgan > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Len Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:43 AM > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] is it tcl problem or pg problem? > > >

Re: [GENERAL] is it tcl problem or pg problem?

2001-08-27 Thread Len Morgan
ot;Len Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:43 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] is it tcl problem or pg problem? > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:07:34AM -0500, Len Morgan wrote: > > Try: > > > > catch { eval exec $N

Re: [GENERAL] is it tcl problem or pg problem?

2001-08-27 Thread newsreader
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:12:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > child process lost (is SIGCHLD ignored or trapped?) > > It's ignored in a backend, see src/backend/tcop/postgres.c. > > Current sources change the SIG_IGN setting to SIG_DFL, which may > well solve your problem; you could try patching