Re: [GENERAL] looking for alternative to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function

On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 11:58:07AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking into PostgreSQL. Coming from a MySQL background, I have > made heavy use of its very useful GROUP_CONCAT function. You can > read about the function here: > > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/group

Re: [GENERAL] looking for alternative to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm looking into PostgreSQL. Coming from a MySQL > background, I have made heavy use of its very useful > GROUP_CONCAT function. You can read about the function > here: > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/group-by-functions.html > Is there a PostgreSQL alternative

Re: [GENERAL] looking for alternative to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function

> Hi all, > > I'm looking into PostgreSQL. Coming from a MySQL background, > I have made heavy use of its very useful GROUP_CONCAT > function. You can read about the function > here: > > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/group-by-functions.html > > Is there a PostgreSQL alternative to GR

[GENERAL] looking for alternative to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function

Hi all, I'm looking into PostgreSQL. Coming from a MySQL background, I have made heavy use of its very useful GROUP_CONCAT function. You can read about the function here: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/group-by-functions.html Is there a PostgreSQL alternative to GROUP_CONCAT? Thanks, K