Re: [GENERAL] max_connections limit violation not showing in pg_stat_activity

2016-12-08 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello Kevin Getting back at this. > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:kgri...@gmail.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 23. November 2016 17:04 > To: Charles Clavadetscher > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] max_connections limit violat

Re: [GENERAL] max_connections limit violation not showing in pg_stat_activity

2016-11-23 Thread Kevin Grittner
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Charles Clavadetscher wrote: > From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:kgri...@gmail.com] >> Is it possible to upgrade? You are missing over a year's worth >> of fixes for serious bugs and security vulnerabilities. > > Yes. Actually it is foreseen to move to 9.6 (and RedHat

Re: [GENERAL] max_connections limit violation not showing in pg_stat_activity

2016-11-23 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
ject: Re: [GENERAL] max_connections limit violation not showing in > pg_stat_activity > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Charles Clavadetscher > wrote: > > > We are using PostgreSQL 9.3.10 on RedHat (probably 6.x). > > Is it possible to upgrade? You are missing over a

Re: [GENERAL] max_connections limit violation not showing in pg_stat_activity

2016-11-22 Thread Kevin Grittner
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Charles Clavadetscher wrote: > We are using PostgreSQL 9.3.10 on RedHat (probably 6.x). Is it possible to upgrade? You are missing over a year's worth of fixes for serious bugs and security vulnerabilities. https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ > Amo

[GENERAL] max_connections limit violation not showing in pg_stat_activity

2016-11-22 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello We are using PostgreSQL 9.3.10 on RedHat (probably 6.x). The database is hosted by an internal service provider and we have superuser access to it over a PG client, e.g. psql, but not to the OS. For that reason we only have access to the log files indirectly using some of the built in syste