Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_pages increase

2010-11-01 Thread Vick Khera
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 4:43 AM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote: I using Postgresql 8.1 and during vacuum at night time, I am getting the following log: number of page slots needed (2520048) exceeds max_fsm_pages (356656) Do I need to increase max_fsm_pages to 2520048? Does it have any

[GENERAL] max_fsm_pages increase

2010-10-31 Thread AI Rumman
I using Postgresql 8.1 and during vacuum at night time, I am getting the following log: number of page slots needed (2520048) exceeds max_fsm_pages (356656) Do I need to increase max_fsm_pages to 2520048? Does it have any bad affect?

Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_pages increase

2010-10-31 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello 2010/10/31 AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com: I using Postgresql 8.1 and during vacuum at night time, I am getting the following log: number of page slots needed (2520048) exceeds max_fsm_pages (356656) Do I need to increase max_fsm_pages to 2520048? Does it have any bad affect? I takes a

Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_pages increase

2010-10-31 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:43 AM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote: I using Postgresql 8.1 and during vacuum at night time, I am getting the following log: number of page slots needed (2520048) exceeds max_fsm_pages (356656) Do I need to increase max_fsm_pages to 2520048? Does it have any

[GENERAL] max_fsm_pages

2006-11-05 Thread Naz Gassiep
I just did a vacuum analyze and I got a message I've never seen before: conwatchlive=# vacuum analyze; NOTICE: number of page slots needed (27056) exceeds max_fsm_pages (2) HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter max_fsm_pages to a value over 27056. VACUUM conwatchlive=#

Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_pages

2006-11-05 Thread Andreas Kretschmer
Naz Gassiep [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: NOTICE: number of page slots needed (27056) exceeds max_fsm_pages (2) HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter max_fsm_pages to a value over 27056. VACUUM conwatchlive=# What does this mean? I assume it has nothing to do with the

Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_pages

2004-07-09 Thread Vivek Khera
TL == Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TL VACUUM will fill whatever FSM space is available. You do have to TL restart the postmaster to get the increased FSM size to be allocated, TL but you don't have to do any magic pushups beyond that. Do you need a full restart or will a simple reload

[GENERAL] max_fsm_pages

2004-07-01 Thread wespvp
If max_fsm_pages is too small and I have space not reclaimed by vacuum, if I increase max_fsm_pages and restart postmaster, will the next VACUUM ANALYZE relcaim all overlooked pages or must I do a VACUUM FULL? Wes ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9:

Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_pages

2004-07-01 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
If you increase max_fsm_pages to a large enough number then the next vacuum analyze will make all the pages with free space available to be reused. A normal VACUUM does not actually reclaim space (unless it's at the end of the table I think), it only marks the space as reuseable. VACUUM FULL

Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_pages

2004-07-01 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 11:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If max_fsm_pages is too small and I have space not reclaimed by vacuum, if I increase max_fsm_pages and restart postmaster, will the next VACUUM ANALYZE relcaim all overlooked pages or must I do a VACUUM FULL? Let's say you have a table

Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_pages

2003-12-08 Thread Franco Bruno Borghesi
I've read this message, and tryed to apply this changes to my own database. sapiens=# vacuum verbose; ... INFO: free space map: 1 relations, 39 pages stored; 48 total pages needed DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1000 relations + 3 pages = 237 kB shared memory. 1 relation and 48 pages seems