On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:40:18PM -0800, Marc Munro wrote:
You will of course be replicating the underlying tables and not the
views, so your replication user will have to have full access to the
unsecured data. This is natural and should not be a concern but may be
worth explicitly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Sullivan) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:40:18PM -0800, Marc Munro wrote:
You will of course be replicating the underlying tables and not the
views, so your replication user will have to have full access to the
unsecured data. This is natural and should not be a
On 11/4/06, Alexander Staubo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am designing an application which requires fine-grained role-basedsecurity, where every logical object in the system has an ACL whichexpresses the permissions allowed by roles.
Have you considered viel for Postgres ()? Here's what it says in
On Mon, 2006-06-11 at 22:27 +0100, Alexander Staubo wrote:
On Nov 6, 2006, at 21:00 , Marc Munro wrote:
For an alternative approach, you might want to check out Veil:
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/veil
Addendum: I took Veil to be undocumented since the source archive
only comes with
I am designing an application which requires fine-grained role-based
security, where every logical object in the system has an ACL which
expresses the permissions allowed by roles.
Implementing this on a high level is trivial, but it must scale, and
scale extremely well. I have some fairly
