On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> That'd be great. It's definitely on my list of things to look into, but
> I'm extremely busy this week. I hope to look into it on Friday, would
> be great to see what you find.
Sequences that are directly defined in extensions do not get d
Michael,
* Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
> >
> > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Stephen,
> > since you committed t
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Stephen,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 01:40:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Philippe BEAUDOIN wrote:
> > I am currently playing with extensions. And I found a strange behaviour
> > change with 9.6beta2 and 3 when pg_dumping a database with an extension
> > having sequences.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Philippe BEAUDOIN wrote:
> I am currently playing with extensions. And I found a strange behaviour
> change with 9.6beta2 and 3 when pg_dumping a database with an extension
> having sequences. This looks like a bug, ... unless I did something wrong.
> [...]
> => as
Hi all,
I am currently playing with extensions. And I found a strange behaviour
change with 9.6beta2 and 3 when pg_dumping a database with an extension
having sequences. This looks like a bug, ... unless I did something wrong.
Here is a test case (a simple linux shell script, that can be easi
