On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:15 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Joshua D. Drake
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:05 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:48 -0600, Scott Mar
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Joshua D. Drake
wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:05 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:48 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> >> I'm trying to do a parallel restore with pg_restor
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:05 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:48 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >> I'm trying to do a parallel restore with pg_restore -j but I'm only
> >> seeing one CPU being used really. The fi
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake
wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:48 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> I'm trying to do a parallel restore with pg_restore -j but I'm only
>> seeing one CPU being used really. The file is custom format, but was
>> made by pg_dump for pgsql 8.3. Is
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:48 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> I'm trying to do a parallel restore with pg_restore -j but I'm only
> seeing one CPU being used really. The file is custom format, but was
> made by pg_dump for pgsql 8.3. Is that a problem? Do I need a backup
> made with 8.4 to run paral
I'm trying to do a parallel restore with pg_restore -j but I'm only
seeing one CPU being used really. The file is custom format, but was
made by pg_dump for pgsql 8.3. Is that a problem? Do I need a backup
made with 8.4 to run parallel restore?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-gen
